What the Flock is going on?

In December 2024, the Twentynine Palms City Council approved a no-bid, sole-source contract with Flock Safety to install 31 ALPR cameras throughout the city, for an annual cost of $102,300.

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are AI-powered cameras that capture and analyze images of all passing vehicles, storing details like your car’s location, date, and time. They also capture your car’s make, model, color, and identifying features such as dents, roof racks, and bumper stickers, often turning these into searchable data points.

These cameras collect data on millions of vehicles regardless of whether the driver is suspected of a crime. These systems are marketed as indispensable tools to fight crime, but they ignore the powerful tools police already have to track criminals, such as cell phone location data, creating a loophole that doesn’t require a warrant or even probable cause.

This mass surveillance system is a serious risk to your privacy and civil liberties. It continuously records your movements into a private nationwide database that can be searched by thousands of other agencies and sold to data brokers. Studies show 99.9% of this data is not related to any crime. In addition to license plate photos, these cameras are capable of streaming live and recorded video. Security researchers have already found numerous vulnerabilities, potentially exposing this data to hackers and stalkers.

Click here to read more local details about our city’s installation.

Sign the petition to terminate the contracts for both 29 Palms and Yucca Valley.

Resources

For a detailed explanation of how ALPRs are a threat to privacy, see this ACLU article as well as this EFF article on ALPRs. Below are some links to learn more about the risks.

Louis Rossmann
Benn Jordan

False and misleading claims by Flock

Claim: The cameras record still images only.
Facts: In July 2025, Flock announced that all LPR cameras would receive a free upgrade to record and stream live video.

Claim: All footage and data is owned by the customer (sheriff)
Facts: Flock has changed their terms of service several times, redefining what “customer data” is and how they are allowed to use and share it. It’s hard to keep up with these ever-changing policies, but each version gives them plenty of loopholes to do what they will with the data. Regardless of ownership, the contract grants broad permission to use and disclose it.

October 2024 definition of customer data
December 2025 definition of customer data
February 2026 definition of customer data
February 2026 customer data allowed use

Claim: Access to the Flock system is restricted to authorized staff of the sheriff’s department
Facts: Flock does not require MFA (multi-factor authentication) for user accounts, which makes it easy for officers to share their password with folks from other agencies, and also vulnerable to phishing or brute force attacks. Audit logs show at least 5 officers from SBSD running searches 24 hours a day, which strongly suggests their accounts are either shared or hacked.

Claim: Officers can only search the system with a valid case number or incident report.
Facts: The “reason” field is optional, and some agencies have instructed their officers to be “as vague as permissible”. Audit logs show less than 30% of SBSD searches reference a case number. Many searches cite reasons which don’t refer to any crime, such as “protest” or “No Kings”. Over 30,000 searches cite meaningless reasons like “inv”.

audit logs from SBSD showing suspicious search reasons

Claim: Flock does not have a contract with ICE or any other federal agencies.
Facts: Flock had a contract with DHS Customs & Border Protection until August 2025, when it was terminated after concerns about unauthorized data sharing. Even without a direct contract, there are several ways ICE agents can access Flock data, including password sharing by other officers, as reported by 404 Media.

Claim: The Flock system is no different than putting an officer on the corner, writing down the license plate of every car driving by.
Facts: The Flock system records tens of billions of images every month with AI assisted object recognition and tagging. At scale, this system is more similar to placing a GPS tracker on every car, logging its movements 24/7.

Get Involved

Want to help? Here are some options.

Sign the petition to terminate our city’s contract.

Email your council members and tell them how you feel.

Attend City Council meetings. Usually every other Tuesday, the calendar is here.

Join the Discord server to discuss strategy with other activists.

File public records requests with the city or county to sunshine more details about the contracts and find out how your data is being used.

News Stories

Flock Uses Overseas Gig Workers to Build its Surveillance AI

California Dragnet—New Data Set Shows Scale of Vehicle Surveillance in the Golden State

Flock Said It Does Not Use Dark Web Data. My Analysis of Their Code Tells a Different Story

City covers Flock cameras while waiting for removal

Flock Exposed Its AI-Powered Cameras to the Internet. We Tracked Ourselves

Police used Flock cameras to falsely accuse a Denver woman of package theft

Police Told to Be ‘as Vague as Permissible’ About Why They Use Flock

Feds Used Local Cop’s Password to Do Immigration Surveillance With Flock Cameras

Texas Sheriff used Flock to investigate a woman who had an abortion

Researcher who oversaw Flock surveillance study now has concerns about it

Flock Safety’s Feature Updates Cannot Make Automated License Plate Readers Safe

Public Interest Law Firm Calls on Arkansas City to Remove Surveillance Camera from in Front of Innocent Family’s Home

Flock Uses Overseas Gig Workers to Build its Surveillance AI